This post is for the continuation of a thead from another site where the Theory of Evolution vs. a Creationist approach is being discussed as to the best explanation for the observable evidences of changes is being discussed. To date, what has been stipulated is that evidence is defined as any data that are verifiable like fossils, DNA and others; that in science a Theory is the top rung and that the Theory of Evolution will never be a "proof" of the observable fact of biological change. The argument is whether the Theory of Evolution (ToE) is in fact the best explanation, which is admittedly the most prevalently believed in scientific circles in contemporary culture.
The evidence has just begun to be examined and, as many times beginnings do, started at the beginning, namely the Cambrian Explosion in the fossil record. Please follow the comment thread for a continued discussion, where the first comment is the last comment and follow-up question from the previous line of discussion.